Golden recipe for Turkey and Israel

Illustration by Necmettin Asma - twitter.com/necmettinasma

The new rapproachement of Ankara in its diplomatic relations with the Israeli government gives hope for a better future in the Middle East

A rare rapprochement is currently taking place when everything else is sort of falling apart in the Middle East. Israel and Turkey finally signed a normalization deal after six years of diplomatic impasse. It is expected that the two countries will exchange ambassadors in a matter of weeks.

Following the Mavi Marmara incident, Israel had already offered an apology for the deaths of nine Turkish citizens and a Turkish-American and it had also agreed to pay compensation for the victims' families. Ankara had demanded the lifting of the naval blockade in Gaza, which was unacceptable for Israel from the very beginning. At the other end, Israel demanded the dropping of lawsuits against Israeli military officials and dismantling the Hamas quarters in Turkey that serves for planning terrorist attacks against Israel. One of the West Bank leaders of Hamas, Saleh al-Arouri, was already expelled.

There is nothing new in the conditions set out in the reconciliation agreement. These conditions have been already known for years. Turkey's relations with Hamas and the naval blockade of Gaza have been the main complications since day one. What is new is that at the end, both countries' leaders had decided that the right time had finally come. They worked hard to find the perfect recipe during negotiations. Following all the populist statements against each other, both leaders presented the deal as their own victory, although there is no one who gained 100 percent of what they wanted.

Diplomatic talks aimed at repairing the six-year-old rift with Israel gained speed in December of last year as part of Turkey's foreign policy recalibration. This change had to come as Turkey's relations with its main source of energy, Russia, critically deteriorated after Turkish jets shot down a Russian fighter jet in November 2015. Turkey decided to diversify its energy resources to reduce its energy dependence on Russia. For Israel, Turkey is the most efficient and cost beneficial channel for potential natural gas sales to Europe. Turkey also needs Israel's military technology and intelligence cooperation for its own security concerns in Syria and terrorist attacks it faces at home as well as for its ongoing conflict with the PKK.

Only trade survived the turbulence during the impasse. Economic relations were the only spot where relations did not deteriorate. However, we are far from the days when Israeli football players were greeted in Turkey with chants of "I love you Revivo." Similarly, I do not hear İbrahim Tatlıses in taxis in Tel Aviv anymore.

There is an important group in Turkish society for whom Israel and Zionism are the enemy and fascism. On the Israeli side, some Israelis lost trust in Turkey. Building mutual trust and restarting cultural events to refresh the friendship between the two societies are the most important steps to proceed.

An important improvement was reached last week. For the first time in years, Turkish authorities invited Israeli Charge d'affaires Amira Oron to the Justice and Development Party's (AK Party) traditional iftar dinner for foreign ambassadors hosted by Prime Minister Binali Yıldırım in Ankara. Considering the lack of presence of the AK Party ruling elites in Israel's independence reception both in Istanbul and Ankara, this is important progress. The presence of Oron, the top Israeli official in Ankara, shows how diplomatic relations are improving following the reconciliation deal.

There is a recent study conducted by the Ankara Policies Center analyzing Turkish youth's perception of the relationship between Turkey and Israel. The crucial finding of the study is that Israel is perceived as an economic rather than a strategic military partner. Even though Israel is perceived as the most important country in the Middle East, it is no longer perceived as Turkey's gate to the West. There are no doubts regarding the Israel's legitimacy, but what people know about Israel does not exceed Jerusalem and the issue of Palestine.

Even though a deal has been reached, there is no magical formula to enter a new golden age similar to the 1990s. The alliance between the two countries may help bring stability to the region. In addition, leaving a door open for a future natural gas deal, forming a new alliance in these turbulent times and using Turkey's relationship with Hamas to prevent a future conflict in Gaza are the real logic behind the reasoning of the deal.

Karel Valansi Daily Sabah 11 June 2016

http://www.dailysabah.com/op-ed/2016/07/11/golden-recipe-for-turkey-and-israel

Disclaimer: La verdad i las istoryas ke mos kontamos

Bazado sovre la novela de 2015 de Renée Knight, Disclaimer es una seri psikolojika de suspenso, estrenada en Apple TV+ en 2024. Eskrita i dirijida por Alfonso Cuarón, ganador de sinko Premios Oscar, esta mini-seri de syete epizodios eksplora la fuersa de la verdad, de las istoryas ke mos kontamos i de la manera en ke vemos los evenimientos, ambezando tambiyen el peligro de los sekretos. En esta seri ay munchos aktores famozos: Cate Blanchett interpreta a Catherine Ravenscroft; Sacha Baron Cohen su marido Robert; Kodi Smit-McPhee su ijo Nicholas; Kevin Kline da vida a Stephen Brigstocke i Lesley Manville interpreta a su mujer Nancy. La istorya sige a Catherine, una periodista muy konosida. Un dia una novela aparese i empesa a deskuvrir un sekreto muy personal de su pasado. Los eventos del pasado son kontados desde diferentes puntos de vista, la seri invita al spektator a kestyonar la memoria, la identidad, la persepsion i la relasyon entre la verdad i la manera ke kontamos la mizm...

Devamı

NATO’s Southern Flank is Becoming a Strategic Frontier

On 8 July, as NATO leaders gathered in Ankara, the ceasefire between the United States and Iran collapsed, with Washington launching renewed strikes as the meeting was underway. The conflict involving Iran that began on 28 February was expected to remain limited in duration and was widely described as a “short-term excursion,” yet, more than six months later—after an April ceasefire, a June memorandum of understanding, and its collapse—the conflict remains unresolved. For Washington, the conflict has become a sustained drain on attention, assets, and Alliance coherence, raising difficult questions about burden sharing and the credibility of U.S. deterrence commitments across the Middle East. The conflict’s prolongation and intensification, with regionalization still unfolding, have called into question whether NATO’s Southern neighborhood framework—and, by extension, the U.S. force posture underpinning it—is sufficient for the current security environment. The Alliance des...

Devamı

From the Indo-Pacific to the Middle East: can the NATO’s IP4 Partnership Model work?

Recent proposals to broaden the Abraham Accords have renewed discussion of regional security cooperation in the Middle East. In May 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump publicly called on Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, and Jordan to join the Abraham Accords, in a social media post following phone calls with regional leaders, describing the initiative as an “unparalleled world coalition” (Chiacu and Pamuk 2026). This proposal, although framed in diplomatic and political terms, raises a more structural question: can NATO’s Indo-Pacific Four (IP4) partnership model of selective, issue-based cooperation be adapted to the Abraham Accord countries? The question matters because the Middle East has repeatedly struggled to institutionalize durable and inclusive security arrangements. Existing frameworks such as the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and the Arab League have not developed into effective collective security mechanisms, while more ambitious proposals such as the Middle Eas...

Devamı

Karel Valansi'nin kaleminden...

Bu Blogda Ara